While you and your friends are marking the “No” box on your ballot for Proposition 23, be sure to do the same for its less glamorous and more underhanded cousin, Proposition 26. If it passes, this proposal will shift enormous costs for pollution and its effects from rich corporate polluters over to California’s cash-strapped taxpayers, i.e., you, me, our kids, and our neighbors.
Proposition 26 is a deliberately disingenuous attempt by oil, tobacco and alcoholic beverage companies to prevent new fees to be levied on the products or consequences of their industries. Oil companies, for example, want to avoid having to pay new fees that would help pay for the clean-up of oil spills they cause. They instead want to force California taxpayers to pay for their oil spills. They cravenly hide this agenda behind the pleasantly mainstream-sounding slogan, “No Hidden Taxes.”
Provides insights and analysis
regarding
climate change policy,
legislation,
business and science,
as well as
developments
specific to California.
Showing posts with label sustainability. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sustainability. Show all posts
Wednesday, October 27, 2010
Thursday, November 5, 2009
How Many Climate Change or Sustainability Events is a Good Thing?
There are so many climate change and/or sustainability conferences taking place in California that it is impossible to keep track of all of them. In just a two-month period I had the good fortune to attend the recent Bioneers and Tides Momentum conferences, as well as the inaugural Next Agenda climate change event, and, most recently, a sustainability tour event in Berkeley hosted by East Bay Green Tours. Other recent prominent events that I happened to miss included San Francisco’s annual West Coast Green and the October 19 Social Media for Sustainability Conference.
A day or even half a day to attend an event is an enormous investment of valuable time. Is every event really worth it?
A simple answer would be “no,” but that’s not completely true. It depends on what knowledge and motivation you bring to the event and what you wish to get out of it. It brings to mind a favorite axiom of market economists: The question goes “What is (product X) really worth?” And the answer is, “Whatever price someone is willing to pay for it.”
A simple answer would be “no,” but that’s not completely true. It depends on what knowledge and motivation you bring to the event and what you wish to get out of it. It brings to mind a favorite axiom of market economists: The question goes “What is (product X) really worth?” And the answer is, “Whatever price someone is willing to pay for it.”
The Bioneers conference in October was rich in thought-provoking speakers and panel discussions, and I wished I had more time to spend there. On the one day that I attended, I was deeply impressed with the visionary knowledge evidenced by Bioneers CEO and founder Kenny Ausubel and the amazing expertise and sharp mind of watershed expert Brock Dolman. I was privileged to see a presentation by world-famous food expert Michael Pollan, and I also learned some interesting ideas large and small about breakthrough sustainability practices, trends, and obstacles for businesses during an afternoon panel discussion. However, three other speakers during the morning plenary, while engaging, were essentially a waste of time if one was hoping to learn hard new facts.
The Next Agenda climate change event, "Clean Energy Challenge," hosted in September by the charismatic and articulate Peter Leyden, featured impressively accomplished speakers and was moving, inspiring, and potentially groundbreaking. Not one to reach for melodrama, I nonetheless found myself at day’s end standing up and speaking about my love for my two small children and my genuine fear for the safety of their generation. Other fathers, eyes moist, came up to me afterward to thank me for my heartfelt words. My life normally isn’t so emotionally charged. But conference participants with whom I spoke afterward all agreed that, good as it felt, the Next Agenda event was much ado about nothing within the context of the great climate change debate if Leyden and his team couldn’t deliver on their planned next steps for collective action. The jury is out.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)